For Work / Against Work
Debates on the centrality of work

Deranty, Jean-Philippe Lost Paradigm: the Fate of Work in post-war French Philosophy 2016 Article Merleau-Ponty, On Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, On Sartre Weil, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, Work Paradigm, Praxis, French Philosophy, Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, Structuralism
Citation Deranty, Jean-Philippe 2016 Article Rev. Int. Philos. Weil Merleau-Ponty Sartre Work Paradigm Praxis French Philosophy Foucault Derrida Deleuze Structuralism Merleau-Ponty On Merleau-Ponty Sartre On Sartre

"Lost Paradigm: the Fate of Work in post-war French Philosophy"

by Deranty, Jean-Philippe (2016)

Abstract

For a brief period, between the years immediately preceding the Second World War and for about a decade thereafter, the most important authors in French philosophy (Weil, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre) conducted their reflections within a “work paradigm”, that is, within theoretical frameworks in which the concept of work played the central, organising role. The first three sections of the paper identify the different meanings of work, which, brought together under the umbrella concept of “praxis”, underpinned this paradigm. The central claim advanced by the paper in section 4 is that the rise of a new paradigm in the following generation of French philosophy (Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze), around the concepts of structure, text and discourse, was explicitly directed against work. In the final section I identify a “return to work” in French philosophy (notably via Rancière), brought about, I argue, by the problematic severing of theory and practice that is inherent in structuralist methods.

Keywords

Weil, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, Work Paradigm, Praxis, French Philosophy, Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, Structuralism

Themes

Merleau-Ponty, On Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, On Sartre

Links to Reference

Citation

Share


How to contribute.