"Development and Validation of the Workplace Dignity Scale"
by Thomas, Benjamin; Lucas, Kristen (2019)
Abstract
As organizational scholars have become critically attuned to human flourishing in the workplace, interest in workplace dignity has grown rapidly. Yet, a valid scale to measure employees? perceptions of dignity in the workplace has yet to be developed, thereby limiting potential empirical insights. To fill this need, we conducted a systematic, multi-study scale development project. Using data generated from focus groups (N = 62), an expert panel (N = 11), and two surveys (N = 401 and N = 542), we developed and validated an 18-item Workplace Dignity Scale (WDS). Our studies reveal evidence in support of the WDS? psychometric properties, as well as its content, construct, and criterion-related validity. Our structural models support predictive relationships between workplace characteristics (e.g., dirty work, income insufficiency) and dignity. Moreover, we observed the incremental validity of workplace dignity to account for variance in employee engagement, burnout, and turnover intentions above and beyond the explanatory effects of organizational respect and meaningful work. These results demonstrate the promise of the WDS for organizational research.
Key Passage
What distinguishes workplace dignity from human dignity is that the former is composed of two sources of worth. Human dignity is founded on to the premise of inherent dignity, which is the belief that all people are entitled to an equal and unconditional worth simply for being human. In contrast, workplace dignity is founded on inherent dignity and earned dignity, which is the worth accrued through instrumental contributions on the job and, as such, is variable and conditional (Hodson, 2001). Although inherent and earned dignities logically contradict one another (i.e., unconditional and equal value opposes the notion of conditional and unequal value), in practice they are more complementary and intertwined (Pirson, 2017). (p.76)
Keywords
Empirical Study, Dignity, Organisations, Empirical ResearchThemes
Organisation and Management StudiesLinks to Reference
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118807784
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601118807784
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1059601118807784
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1059601118807784
Citation
Share
How to contribute.